What Is Agreement In Syntax

The isolation of the list of works that should be considered “fundamental” in a given field or subsector is obviously a very subjective question, for which it may be difficult (if not impossible) to reach consensus; however, these works, hopefully, will put, if not all works on agreement, that would merit such a name (see also Chomsky 2000 and Chomsky 2001, both cited as test-goal). Moravcsik 1978 is a groundbreaking typological study of the conformity of a large typological sample. George and Kornfilt in 1981, Fassi Fehri in 1988, Bobaljik in 1995, Chung in 1998 and Rackowski and Richards 2005 are supposed to be case studies on agreement in certain languages (or language families), but they have proven to be very influential and important for the development of the theory of concordance in general. In 1997, research on uniqueness in the language of adults and the study of language learning. Anagnostopoulou 2003 is an innovative case study on how agreement (and climate doubling) can help to understand the syntax of a given construction, in this case the verb ditransity. Wechsler and Zlati`2003 represent a theory of adequacy that lies in the grammar of the head-controlled sentence structure (HPSG) and lexical-functional grammar (LFG), paying particular attention to discursium phenomena and the resolution of chords in coordinations. In nomine sentences, the adjectives do not show a match with the noun, although pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel “with your beautiful books” (“szép”: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive “your” and the fall marking “with” are marked only on the name.

1. Introduction: Category differences as window of the agreement theory 2. Fundamental agreement and Category 3 distinctions. The unit of verbal chords and adjectives 4. Explanation of the limitation of the person agreement 5. Settings of the agreement. Modern English doesn`t have much correspondence, although it`s there. There is also a consensus between pronouns and precursors. Examples can be found in English (although English pronouns mainly follow natural sex and not grammatical sex): Bobaljik, Jonathan David. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. PhD diss, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

In the case of verbs, a gender agreement is less widespread, although it may still occur. In the French past, for example, the former work of the participants corresponds, in certain circumstances, to the subject or an object (for more details, see compound past). In Russian and most other Slavic languages, the form of the past in sex corresponds to the subject. A complete treatment of Morphosyntax Germanic bending systems, which are used in distributed morphology (DM; see Walnut 1997, citing morphological approaches; and Morris Halle and Alex Marantz, 1963, “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection,” in The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, edited by Kenneth L. Hale, Samuel Jay Keyser, and Sylvain Bromberger, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 11-176). Although this work does not involve concordance (but rather flexion in general), this work is decisive enough to determine the division of labour between morphology and syntax when dealing formally with chords in a minimalist/DM framework. If you are referring to general groups or names, you should pay attention to the number and gender agreement.

Dit bericht werd geplaatst in Geen categorie door Marc . Bookmark de permalink .

Reacties zijn gesloten.